Killer Whales- Language
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
Annotated
Bibliography
Kaufman, Allison & et al. Using a Self-Organizing Map (SOM) and the
Hyperspace Analog
to Language (HAL) Model to
Identify Patters of Syntax and Structure in the Songs of Humpback Whales.
International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2012, 25, 237-275.
This article presents ideas that I had not previously
thought of. Kaufman et al. bring up the idea that the whale’s songs represent their
form of language. There is also the idea that we should not only define
language in a standard manner. Instead of a complex linguistics systems whales
seem to use syntax in order communicate with each other. The research was
conducted using two different fully automated models that examined syntax and structure
of humpback whale song. The songs were then classified depending on their
patterns, which is similar to noun, verb, and direct object in human language. These
patterns were identified and specified to geographical areas. These patterns
did support the idea that humpback whale songs are unique to specific regions
and are likely to be transferred culturally.
Author Allison B. Kaufman received her Ph.D. in neuroscience
at the University of California at Riverside in 210. Sean Green is a professor in
the Psychology department at the University of Buffalo. This article is a peer
reviewed journal that can be found in the International Journal of Comparative
Psychology.
This research is helpful; it provided a good starting
point to my research. After completing this article my interested what sparked
even more. I had not before thought of the idea of considering the sound that
the whales produce as a song. The graphs and research done for the completion
of this article will move my research forward and provide evidence for my final
project on the fact that whales do communicate and their communication differs
depending on the region.
Riesch, Rudiger et al. Whistle sequences in wild killer whales (Orcinus
orca). Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America. Vol. 124, No.3,
September 2008.
This article looks at stereotypical vocal signals of
whales and attempted to determine if specific sequences increased the range of
information being transferred. The stupid of language in marine mammals is
still extremely new. The study was done in Vancouver Island, British Columbia.
There were a total 1140 whistles transitions and 192 whistle sequences recorded
for the whales in that specific region. The findings show that the whistles
consist of whistle types that were not random. There was also a difference
found between male and female whistles; this showed different social behaviors
within the groups of whales.
Author Rudiger Riesch works for the department of
zoology at the University of Oklahoma. This article is published in the Journal
of the Acoustical Society of America. The authors do a great job of admitting
that some of their research only leads to more questions and do not directly
answer the questions they set out to answer. I think if this stupid were to be
done again it should be done so in a manner that allows for a great region of
whales to be tested.
This article in combination with my first will both
fit really nicely into my final product. This article shows directly the
different manners in which the males communicate with each other. It is extremely
interesting to me the social aspect of the whales, the fact that males and
females communicate in different manners really helps to prove the fact that
these intelligent mammals do have language.
Saulitis, Eva et al. Vocal repertoire and acoustic behavior of the
isolated AT1 killer whale
subpopulation in southern Alaska. Canadian Journal
of Zoology. NRC Canada. 2005.
This article looks at different types of killer
whales in the southern parts of Alaska. There are three types of whales
presented in this article but one of which is studied at length and that is the
AT 1 transient which is a killer whale who eats eat and lives in the Prince
William Sound/Kenai Fjords region. Researched identified 14 discrete, pulsed
calls in the whales vocal repertoire. These calls were found to be completely different
of these whales in the West Coast and Gulf of Alaska. It was found that AT1
transients were silent most of the time and used a foraging strategy of stealth.
AT1 transients vocalization was seen to be context specific dissimilar to
resident (fish-eaters).
Eva Saulitis, trained in marine biology received her
M.S. from the University of Alaska Fairbanks in 1993. Since this time Saulitis
has studied killer whales of Prince William Sound, Kenai Fjords, and the
Aleutain. She is also co-author of numerous scientific publications. This
article is published in the Canadian Journal of Zoology.
The graphs and photographs will work as great visual
ideas for my presentation. Eva Saulitis seems to have great passion for better understanding
and studying killer whales. This article helps present yet another instance in
a completely different region of the world then the other articles. This
article helps present yet another view point and that is the fact that it is
not only different regions of killer whales that communicate in a different manner
but those whales who have a different diet communicate in a different manner.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

I like your idea of incorporating graphs into your blog with written comments explaining them. It may also be helpful for you to interview someone who has experience studying whales or marine life (may it be through a Lewis faculty member or an outside source). My question is, what made you want to study whales and what do you hope to gain? Do you want it to be proven that whales do indeed have their own language, and if they do, where do we go from here? I find that there are factors (from your sources) that explain that whales who have different diets communicate differently, and it makes me wonder what other conditions can create differences within their communication.
ReplyDelete